This is the new De Moulas Market Basket Site Plan.
Where is the boathouse? Voice
your opinion ...
Go to the new South Coast forums

"More economic development has been done by 'historic preservationists',
in New Bedford, than what Matt (Morrissey) and the Mayor have accomplished together."
- Peggi Medeiros
Hear
Peggi Medeiros's whole April 11, 2009 interview on WBSM.
| New Plan | Old Plan | |
![]() |
Do you see a substantial difference? Who do you think the tenant is going to
be?
(HD spent a fortune on engineering permits, etc. that Dickinson is planning
to use to expedite their process. Any chance of a quid pro quo there? Is HD
waiting in the wings?)
The Alternative was (could be):
"We were always going to save the mill." - L. Duane Jackson.
Below taken from a Letter to City Council against demolition by me (edited slightly for clarity here) based on a converstion between Jackson and myself.
Jackson said that the worst case scenario was (if they went no further) that they were going to make the first floor retail and the upper floors office space and residential.
In a conversation that I had with Jackson (post designation in which he said Lang and Morrisey kept changing the deal) when I mentioned that a suggestion of lack of funding was being bandied about, he was very surprised and even angered to hear that his group may have been being impugned as not being able to capitalize the project and he said that I could put the following into the public domain:
1. They ([UIAI] Jackson/Samuels) agreed
to increase the deposit from $50k to $100k at the city’s request (which
was beyond the requisite of the RFP).
2. They [UIAI] had put $40k on the Meldon building for
a 30 day option with an agreement for an added $80k (TTL 120k).
3. Before the designation the Lang adminsitration then asked [UIAI] for another
$200k (nonrefundable) deposit and they [UIAI] said no.
(Enough was enough).
They had $50k + $40k already out and additionally to putting out a far more comprehensive proposal which in time and effort is 70k including $39k in architectural fees.
They had spent the money (around $100k) in contrast to Dickinson who had then put out $10k for the city land (refundable) and $15k for the adjacent lot. They wanted the designation first because they were going to be spending more money (on the project) and they felt that the way that the situation kept being re-traded they lost faith that they could trust the city to hold up their end.
They had put in $100k to loose the deal! A deal they offered twice ($1,000,000)as much to the city for.
"We were always going to save the mill." - L. Duane Jackson.
Poster advertised as Public (!?) Meeting but was only sent to an exclusive email list. Did you see it in the paper or hear it on WBSM?
Peggi
Medeiros1 - (4 Meg ) Dartmouth Heritage
Preservation Trust - formerly of W.H.A.L.E. (Low quality audio: use
Headphones )
P Medeiros/ Jane Gonsalves- Ward 5 Councilor (1.5
Meg ) (Low quality audio: use Headphones )
Chuck Dade
- (4 Meg ) (Low quality audio: use Headphones )
Entire Meeting's Audio - (60 Meg) (Low quality audio: use Headphones
|
Developer Designation--AUDIO
|
|
RFP -Evaluation Committee Meetings--AUDIO
|
Legal Notices:
RFPs:
Fairhaven
Mills Sawyer
Hicks
Logan
Fairhaven Mills RFP Addendum 4- Q & A Schedule clarification.
Fairhaven Mills RFP Addendum 3 -- Page1 | Page 2 | Page 3 -- Including Mill razing questions.
Fairhaven Mills RFP Addendum 2- Extension of Proposal Due date to February 16, 2007.
IG Response Letter - April 25, 2006
| Planning Board tables decision Mar 15 2006 - mp3 | 2.6 Meg |
Conservation Committee order of conditions 12/12/2005
Public Notice of Environmental
Review --150 k --- Review for the
20 day comment period for the public to voice concerns to the Sec. of the Environment
MEPA Environmental Notification Form 8-24-05 - 25 k | MEPA